Of course this is also valid for us at in the current society. It is really essential to cooperate or collaborate to be successful in innovation nowadays. The story of the lone genius is a myth. Edison did NOT find out things by himself. That was teamwork as well in those days.
Today we have 3 dominant megatrends in innovation; Insighting, Business Model innovation and Open Innovation.
The last one is totally built upon cooperation ….or actually on collaboration … or ….yeah, what do we mean really? What is the difference between the two? Let us first look at what Wikipedia tells us:
Cooperation: “The process of working or acting together…. In its simplest form it involves things working in harmony, side by side…. It is the alternative to working separately in competition.
Collaboration: “An iterative process where two or more people, units or companies together to realize shared goals, for example, an intellectual endeavor that is creative in nature—by sharing knowledge, learning and building consensus.”
It seems that Cooperation is an efficiency measure, meaning “doing things the right way” for cost or time saving reasons. The involved parties both have need for a similar resource, and find commercial benefits in sharing that resource… but they usually have two different goals to achieve. That is why we also have the expression “Coopetition” where two competing entities can work together, or cooperate, because they both prosper on pooling of some their resources. A cooperation between two entities is a temporary situation that is dissolved when their respective goals are achieved. To make it work you do not need all too much trust. You just need fairness, knowing that the other will stick to his/her part of the deal and invest as much resources/time/money as you agreed upon in the first end. Sometimes a cooperation ends due to that one of the parties has a feeling of an asymmetry in the result of the cooperation, i.e. one gains much more than the other.
In Collaboration though, each of the entities put in sufficient different resources needed to achieve a common goal. Competences are usually complementary, whereas in cooperation you share the same competence. Collaboration is then more of an effectiveness measure, meaning “doing the right things” to achieve something with a higher value than one party could do alone. The mutual dependency is stronger.
To collaborate in a good way you really have to be really committed to the shared goal and not only participating to achieve your part of it. Trust is a must, as you can’t achieve the goal by yourself. A good collaboration includes an expectation that the reward for having achieved the shared goal (in whatever form it is, such as fame, status, appreciation or money) is also shared in fair way. Lacking this – we will get distrust and further attempts to restart a collaboration is hard.
The moral is: Open innovation works OK with cooperation, but even better with collaboration. To be able to collaborate again you need to secure a sustainable trust, reconfirmed by a “fair” split of the results of the preceding collaboration. Remember to set this split before the collaboration starts….
By Bengt Järrehult
Bengt Järrehult, PhD and recently appointed as Fellow Scientist Innovation at SCA, is Director of Innovation and Knowledge Management at the SCA headquarters in Sweden. Apart from his daily work at SCA, Dr Järrehult is also an adjunct professor in Innovative Packaging Logistics at the Lund Technical University teaching in Innovation Engineering and Packaging as well as a visiting professor in Innovation at the Institution of Economic Research at the Lund University. He is also a regular lecturer at Chalmers University in Gothenburg for students in the masters program of Management and Economics of Innovation.